najla wrote:if patient is receiving for example 2 L o2 via nasal canulla how calculate percentage o2 equivalent to?
if patient is receiving for example 2 L o2 via nasal canulla how calculate percentage o2 equivalent to?
Was this also a question in the exam ?
Here is an answer
But this is too complicated
The wards have charts to give the percentages
This book on the web gives sych a chart
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=n0ye-tRYTNkC&pg=PA487&lpg=PA487&dq=calculate+oxygen+delivery+masks+cannulae&source=bl&ots=Aq5PJmqZ_O&sig=cJQW2HgW3LyTKr7PYTbMZbwD1Ew&hl=en&ei=z62sSqWjCcnPjAfzybXuBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1#v=onepage&q=&f=false
Box 1. Calculating the inspiratory
oxygen fraction (FIO2) delivered by
nasal prongs
Flow of oxygen to nasal prongs
= 4 L·min-1 (67 mL·s-1).
Breathing frequency = 20 min-1.
Tidal volume = 500 mL.
Inspiratory:expiratory time ratio 1:2
(= inspiratory time of 1 s).
Size of the anatomical reservoir of the
nose = 50 mL.
Inspiration comprises 50 mL pure
oxygen (anatomical reservoir) + 67
mL pure oxygen (nasal prongs) +
ambient air: 117 mL oxygen (FIO2
1.0) + 383 mL air (FIO2 0.21) = FIO2
of ~0.4.
of eyeglasses (for example the socalled
Kickinger Brille, Germany)
for cosmetic reasons (fig. 2).
A newly developed device, the
Vapotherm 2000i (Vapotherm,
Annapolis, MD, USA) is a high-flow
gas delivery device that heats and
humidifies gas for delivery through
a nasal cannula, face mask,
tracheostomy or other common
respiratory appliance.
The Vapotherm 2000i contains a
high-flow cartridge that is rated
for 540 L·min-1 at 95% relative
humidity and a high temperature
(3343°C). The temperature and
humidity are preserved during
flow through a special tube that is
warmed by water so no
condensation takes place
(fig. 3).
The exact mechanism by which these
devices provide a better oxygen
supply than a normal nasal cannula
with the same oxygen flow has not
been fully elucidated. There are
several possibilities: the warmth, the
humidity or the high flow.
Theoretically, high-flow anhydrous
gases could cause the resistance of
the nasal passage to rise, or
discomfort with dry gases could lead
the patient to switch to pure mouth
breathing, resulting in a lower FIO2.
Due to the high costs of this device, it
is not appropriate for home care, but
it may be useful for oxygen supply in
severely ill patients with high oxygen
demand, for example with end-stage
idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
patients listed for lung
transplantation.
Transnasal catheter
In the hospital, a variant of the nasal
cannula is sometimes used the
so-called transnasal catheter (fig. 4).
This catheter is introduced into one
nasal passage and fixed in the
nostril with foam rubber
surrounding the tube. The
anatomical reservoir (naso- and
oropharynx) is about double the size
of that used by the nasal cannula.
The FIO2 is higher compared with
the nasal cannula and is in the
range 0.30.55. The calculation is
shown in Box 2.
Box 2. Calculating the inspiratory
oxygen fraction (FIO2) delivered by the
transnasal catheter
Flow of oxygen to transnasal catheter
Size of the anatomical reservoir
= 100 mL.
Inspiration comprises 100 mL pure
oxygen (anatomical reservoir) + 67 mL
pure oxygen (nasal prongs) + ambient
air: 167 mL oxygen (FIO2 1.0) + 333 mL
air (FIO2 0.21) = FIO2 of ~0.47.
= 6 L·min-1 (= 100 mL·s-1).
Other parameters as before.
oxygen (anatomical reservoir) + 100 ml
air: 200 mL oxygen (FIO2 1.0) + 300 mL
air (FIO2 0.21) = FIO2 of ~0.52.
07 DEVICES FOR OXYGEN ADMINISTRATION DURING SPONTANEOUS BREATHING
76